Unlock smarter real estate deals. Our guide demystifies the price per unit formula, helping investors analyze multifamily properties and find value.
Nov 2, 2025
Blog
In real estate investing, especially in the multifamily space, we're always looking for a quick way to size up a deal. How do you compare a 20-unit building to a 50-unit building without getting lost in the weeds? The answer is the price per unit.
The price per unit formula is simply the Purchase Price divided by the Total Number of Units. Think of it as a great equalizer. It’s a foundational metric that lets you make a quick "apples-to-apples" comparison between properties, giving you a gut check on value before you spend hours underwriting.

If you've ever stood in a grocery aisle comparing two different-sized bags of coffee, you've used this logic. One is a 10-ounce bag for $12, the other a 16-ounce bag for $16. To figure out the better deal, you’d instinctively calculate the price per ounce.
The price per unit metric works the exact same way for apartment buildings. It boils down the value of properties with different price tags and unit counts into a single, easy-to-compare number. It’s the first filter many seasoned investors use to quickly decide if a deal is even worth a deeper look.
Let's look at a real-world scenario. You're presented with two apartment buildings in the same submarket.
On the surface, Property A looks like the "cheaper" option. But let's run the numbers.
For Property A, the calculation is $4,000,000 / 20 units = $200,000 per unit.
For Property B, it’s $5,400,000 / 30 units = $180,000 per unit.
Suddenly, the picture is much clearer. Property B is actually $20,000 cheaper on a per-unit basis. Assuming all else is equal (location, condition, etc.), this simple calculation suggests Property B might be the better investment. For investors looking to refine their analytical skills, you can find further discussions on estimation methods that cover more advanced techniques.
To help you get comfortable with the formula, here's a simple table breaking down its parts.
This breakdown should make it easy to plug in your own numbers and start analyzing deals.
This concept isn't unique to real estate; it's a fundamental business principle. In manufacturing or retail, a similar formula is used to figure out the cost of producing a single item. Their version looks like this: Price per unit = (Total Fixed Costs + Total Variable Costs) / Total Units Produced.
Whether you're making widgets or buying apartment buildings, understanding your per-unit cost is critical for setting prices and identifying value.
Key Takeaway: Price per unit is more than just a math problem; it's a strategic benchmarking tool. It cuts through the noise of different property sizes and prices, giving you a standardized starting point for your analysis.
Okay, theory is great, but let's get our hands dirty. The real test of any metric is how it works when you're staring down a live deal. We're going to walk through a simple, practical example to show you exactly how this plays out in the real world.
Let's imagine we're looking at a property that just hit the market: "The Sycamore Apartments."
Before you even open a calculator, you need to pull two key pieces of information from the offering memorandum or listing. These are the absolute basics.
That’s it. With just those two numbers, we have everything we need for our first-pass analysis. You don't need to dig into the rent roll or the T-12 just yet; this is all about a quick, high-level gut check.
Now for the easy part. We'll take our two data points and plug them straight into the formula:
Price Per Unit = Purchase Price / Total Number of Units
For our deal, the math looks like this:
So, The Sycamore Apartments is trading at $150,000 per unit. This number is our new benchmark, our starting point for all further analysis. It’s a clean, simple metric that lets us compare this deal to others without getting lost in the weeds.
The Real Secret: A price-per-unit figure is meaningless in a vacuum. Its true power comes from comparison. Is a property at $150,000 per door a steal or a ripoff? You can't know until you see what other, similar buildings are selling for right down the street.
On its own, $150,000 per unit is just a number. The magic happens when you stack it up against recent sales comps—comparable properties in the same neighborhood.
Let's say you pull the data and find three similar 50-unit buildings sold nearby in the last six months:
Suddenly, our $150,000 per unit looks pretty compelling. It seems like we might be getting in at a 8-12% discount to the current market rate. That's a huge green flag, telling us this deal is worth a much deeper look.
But if those comps had all sold for around $130,000 per unit, we'd have the opposite reaction. Our deal would look seriously overpriced, and we'd either need to come in with a much lower offer or simply walk away.
To make this even easier, we've built a couple of simple templates for you. They take the manual math out of the equation so you can focus on finding and analyzing deals, not fiddling with a calculator.
Using a template like this creates a consistent process. When you’re sifting through dozens of potential deals, consistency is key. This simple calculation acts as the first filter in a sophisticated underwriting process, helping you quickly weed out the duds and zero in on the opportunities that truly deserve your attention.
The standard price per unit formula is a fantastic tool for a quick "back-of-the-napkin" valuation. It gives you an immediate snapshot of a property's value. But experienced investors know that's just the starting point. Relying only on that one number is like judging a book by its cover—you're guaranteed to miss the important details inside.
To really get an accurate, nuanced read on a deal, we have to look at different flavors of the formula. These variations help us compare apples to apples when properties have different unit sizes, layouts, or income potential. They give you a much sharper analytical edge, especially when the properties you're comparing aren't perfect twins.
This simple diagram shows how the basic price per unit calculation flows, from the core numbers to the final metric.

Think of this as the foundation. Once you understand this straightforward relationship, you're ready to build on it with more advanced analysis.
One of the most powerful variations in your toolbox is the price per square foot (PSF). This metric is absolutely essential when you're comparing two properties that have very different unit mixes. For example, you can't fairly compare a building full of spacious two-bedroom units to one packed with small studios using just the price per door.
The formula couldn't be simpler:
Price Per Square Foot = Purchase Price / Total Gross Leasable Area (GLA)
Let's look at two 20-unit buildings, both on the market for $4,000,000. On the surface, they both ring in at $200,000 per unit.
Now, let's run the numbers for price per square foot:
Suddenly, the picture is crystal clear. Building B is a much better deal on a square-foot basis. You're getting a lot more physical asset for your money, which almost always means higher rent potential down the line.
Another crucial variation to master is the price per bedroom. This metric really shines in markets where shared living is common, like student housing near a campus or co-living setups in dense city centers. It helps you size up a property based on its maximum occupancy and, therefore, its true revenue potential.
The calculation is just as easy:
Price Per Bedroom = Purchase Price / Total Number of Bedrooms
Let's stick with our $4,000,000 price tag but switch up the unit mix.
First, let's look at the standard price per unit:
Based on this alone, Building C looks like the slam dunk. But now, let's run the price per bedroom:
The story completely flips! Building D offers a significantly lower cost per bedroom, signaling a potentially much higher income ceiling if you can set rents on a per-bedroom basis. This is a classic value-add opportunity that the standard formula would have totally missed.
Investor Insight: Choosing the right metric comes down to the property and its market. If you're looking at a building with a varied unit mix, PSF is your go-to. For student housing, price per bedroom will probably tell you the real story.
To clarify how these metrics differ, this table breaks down what each one measures and where it's most useful in your underwriting process.
Each metric provides a different lens through which to view a potential acquisition. Using them together gives you a much richer, more complete picture of the deal.
One final, subtle distinction to keep in mind is the difference between gross units and rentable units. A building might have 50 total units on paper, but if one is being used as the property manager's office, you're only collecting rent from 49 of them.
Calculating the price per rentable unit gives you a more honest picture of the asset’s income-producing power. It’s a small tweak, but it’s critical for grounding your analysis in financial reality. While this metric is related to rental income, it's different from others like the Gross Rent Multiplier, which you can learn about in our guide on what is Gross Rent Multiplier. The most important thing is to be consistent: if you use rentable units for one property, make sure you use it for all your comps.

For seasoned real estate sponsors, price per unit isn't just another line on a spreadsheet. It’s a multi-purpose tool—a Swiss Army knife for both rigorous analysis and powerful storytelling. It’s the metric that helps them sanity-check a deal and sell it to investors.
The best operators don't just calculate this number; they live in its context. They use it as a quick, back-of-the-napkin test to see if a deal is even in the right ballpark. From there, they skillfully weave that simple data point into a compelling investment narrative that makes the opportunity click for their partners.
During underwriting, a sponsor's first job is to protect capital and avoid overpaying. This is where price per unit proves its worth as a brutally honest benchmark. Before they even think about firing up a complex financial model, sponsors use it to get a quick read on where a deal stands.
Let's say a sponsor is looking at a 100-unit property with a $25 million price tag. That’s $250,000 per unit. The very next step is to pull recent sales "comps" for similar buildings in that specific submarket.
This data instantly tells a story. At $250,000 per unit, the target property is priced below the upgraded comps but well above the old, tired one. It suggests the market is willing to pay a $50,000 to $60,000 premium for renovated apartments. If the sponsor’s renovation plan only costs $20,000 per unit, they’ve just found a clear-cut way to manufacture equity.
Sponsor Insight: Price per unit acts as a guardrail against getting caught up in the "story" of a deal. If a property's cost per door is wildly out of sync with the market comps, it’s an immediate red flag that forces a much more skeptical look at the seller's numbers.
Once the internal analysis is done, price per unit becomes a star player in the investor pitch deck and offering memorandum. Sponsors use it to frame the entire opportunity in a way that’s powerful and easy to grasp. A low price per unit is the perfect hook—an "attractive entry point" or a "below-market" deal with built-in upside.
You’ll often see a sponsor frame the deal this way:
"We're acquiring the 'Oakwood Apartments' at $210,000 per unit. This represents a 15% discount to comparable renovated properties in the area, which are consistently trading above $245,000 per unit. This attractive basis gives us a significant margin of safety and a clear path to creating value for our investors."
That language is simple, direct, and incredibly effective. It immediately positions the deal as a smart, value-add play and gives investors confidence that the sponsor has found an edge. It makes all the financial projections that follow feel that much more credible and achievable.
This is a lesson drawn from other industries where data analysis is crucial. For instance, major tech firms found a 20.1% revenue jump was driven by a modest 3.5% price increase combined with other factors, proving small pricing advantages can lead to huge wins.
Of course, top sponsors know the work starts after the acquisition. To manage their properties effectively and continue tracking performance against that initial price-per-unit benchmark, many turn to dedicated software. If you're looking for tools to help with this, you can check out some of the best property management apps to keep operations running smoothly.
This strategic, dual-use of a single metric—first as a disciplined analytical tool, and second as a persuasive marketing element—is what separates the pros from the newcomers. They understand that one number can be both a compass for their own decisions and a magnet for investor capital.
The price per unit formula is an incredibly useful back-of-the-napkin metric. It's the first thing most of us look at. But relying on it exclusively is like trying to navigate a new city with only a compass—you know the general direction, but you’re bound to miss the critical turns and end up on the wrong side of the tracks.
Investors who treat this number as gospel often fall into a few predictable traps. These are the mistakes that can turn a seemingly great deal into a financial headache. Let's walk through them so you can spot them a mile away and adjust your analysis to see the real story behind a property's value.
This is probably the most common mistake I see. You can’t compare a freshly renovated, stabilized property to a value-add project that needs a total gut job and call it an apples-to-apples comparison. A lower price per unit isn't always a bargain; often, it’s a warning sign of a mountain of deferred maintenance and capital expenses waiting for you.
Think about it this way. You're looking at two 50-unit buildings down the street from each other:
On the surface, Property B looks 20% cheaper. But what happens when you budget $50,000 per unit for renovations? Suddenly, your "all-in" cost for Property B jumps to $210,000 per door, making it the more expensive deal of the two.
Pro Tip: Always calculate an "as-stabilized" price per unit. Take the purchase price per door and add your estimated renovation cost per door. This gives you a true apples-to-apples comparison of your total capital investment.
Another major blind spot is failing to account for the unit mix. If you use a standard price-per-unit metric to compare a building full of tiny studio apartments to a property with spacious three-bedroom townhomes, your analysis will be deeply flawed. Their revenue potential, tenant base, and operating costs are completely different animals.
A building with larger units will naturally have a higher price per unit. But it might actually be a much better deal when you look at the price per square foot. This is where using the other variations of the formula becomes essential for digging deeper. Don't let a simple metric blind you to the quality and potential of the underlying asset.
It's a simple truth: not all properties in the same submarket are created equal. A building with a resort-style pool, a state-of-the-art gym, and covered parking will rightfully sell for more than a no-frills building just a few blocks away. Why? Because those amenities directly impact the rents you can charge and the quality of tenants you attract.
The same goes for the micro-location. A property on a quiet, tree-lined street is simply more valuable than one backing up to a noisy highway or a rundown commercial strip. When you're pulling comps, make sure they are truly comparable, both in what they offer and where they sit.
This idea of adjusting for underlying value isn't unique to real estate. The concept of "cost per use" is critical in all sorts of industries. For instance, libraries evaluate journal subscriptions not just on price but on usage data, and they have to adjust for things like inflated download counts to get a true picture. You can see how cost per use is analyzed in academic settings to get a sense of how universal this principle is.
The key to sidestepping these pitfalls is simple: never use the price per unit formula in a vacuum. It should be the start of your investigation, not the end of it.
To build a much stronger, more reliable analysis, make this your workflow:
When you combine these quantitative metrics with your own qualitative judgment, you move from a simplistic calculation to a sophisticated analysis. This layered approach is what separates savvy investors who spot genuine opportunities from the ones who get caught in value traps.
Even when you've got the price per unit formula down, real-world deals always seem to throw a few curveballs. Let's tackle some of the most common questions that pop up when you're in the trenches.
Think of price per unit and cap rate as two different lenses for looking at the same deal. They’re partners in valuation. Price per unit is all about the physical asset—what you're paying for each "door." The cap rate, on the other hand, is a performance metric; it tells you what that asset is earning based on its Net Operating Income (NOI).
Generally, a high price per unit goes hand-in-hand with a low cap rate. This is the classic profile of a premium, stabilized property in a hot market. Conversely, a lower price per unit often comes with a higher cap rate, which might signal a bit more risk or, more excitingly, a value-add opportunity where you can force appreciation by boosting income. Using both gives you a balanced picture of cost versus potential return.
Key Insight: It boils down to this: price per unit tells you what you're paying, while cap rate tells you what you're earning. A smart investor never looks at one without the other.
Absolutely, you just need to swap out the "unit." The core idea of creating a standardized benchmark works across many asset classes. While multifamily investors talk about doors, the concept adapts easily.
The principle is identical: you're creating an apples-to-apples way to compare properties of different sizes. The only rule is to make sure your comparisons are consistent within the same asset type.
This is the million-dollar question, and the honest answer is: it depends entirely on the context. There's no magic number. A $400,000 price per unit could be an absolute steal for a brand-new luxury apartment building in downtown Austin, but it would be laughably overpriced for a 1970s Class C property in a small town.
To figure out if a price is "good," you have to benchmark it against recent, comparable sales—the "comps"—in that specific submarket. A good price is one that lands at or, even better, below the going rate for properties of a similar vintage, condition, and location.
At Homebase, our goal is to help real estate syndicators succeed by taking the back-office headaches off your plate. Our platform is built to handle investor relations, fundraising, and deal management, freeing you up to do what you do best: find great deals and create value. Ready to see how much easier syndication can be? Learn more about Homebase.
Share On Linkedin
Share On Twitter
Share On Linkedin
Share On Twitter
DOMINGO VALADEZ is the co-founder at Homebase and a former product strategy manager at Google.
definition of hurdle rate for real estate investing
Blog
definition of hurdle rate explained: learn what this metric means for real estate deals, how it protects investors, and how it shapes profits.
If you want relevant updates from our team at Homebase, sign up! Your email is never shared.
If you want relevant updates from our team at Homebase, sign up! Your email is never shared.
© 2025 Homebase. All rights reserved.